What Are the Key Differences Between PVA, Starch & PVA-Starch Blends for Textile Sizing?
Each sizing agent behaves differently on warp yarns due to chemical composition and film-forming properties.
1. PVA (Polyvinyl Alcohol)
Synthetic polymer
Excellent film strength & flexibility
High adhesion to cotton
Smooth film and great abrasion resistance
Higher cost than starch
2. Starch (Native or Modified)
Natural carbohydrate polymer
Renewable & biodegradable
Lower cost
Desizes easily
Lower abrasion resistance compared to PVA
Modified starch (like Alpenol’s variants) improves film strength, adhesion, flexibility & consistency
3. PVA–Starch Blend
Combines film strength (PVA) + eco-friendliness (starch)
Balanced viscosity & adhesion
Moderate COD impact
Often used in apparel fabrics & medium-speed looms
Properties, Benefits & Limitations of PVA, Starch & Hybrid Sizing Formulations
Feature | PVA | Starch | PVA–Starch Hybrid |
Film Strength | Excellent | Good | Very Good |
Abrasion Resistance | Excellent | Good | Very Good |
Biodegradability | Poor | Excellent | Good |
Desizability | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
Cost | High | Low | Moderate |
Environmental Load | High COD | Low COD | Medium COD |
Ideal For | High-speed air-jet weaving, denim | Apparel, sheeting, sustainable weaving | General-purpose fabrics |
Modified starch variants (as produced by Alpenol) can close the performance gap with PVA while maintaining biodegradability and offering similar efficiency.
Why Would a Textile Manufacturer Choose PVA Over Starch?
Textile mills choose PVA-based sizing agents when they require:
Maximum abrasion resistance
Strong & flexible films
High protection on coarse or low-quality yarns
High-speed air-jet or rapier weaving
Very low hairiness in warps
PVA is especially useful in:
Denim
Technical textiles
High-density fabric structures
Mills must weigh performance against wastewater treatment challenges. However, many mills that switched to Alpenol achieved the same performance benefits while adopting a more sustainable and environmentally responsible alternative.
Why Choose Starch Over PVA for Warp Sizing?
Mills select starch-based textile sizing agents especially modified starch for weaving when they prioritize:
Sustainability
Low COD discharge
Easy desizing
Lower costs
Medium-speed to high-speed weaving
Modern modified starch sizing chemicals such as Alpenol formulations offer:
Enhanced film strength
Improved abrasion resistance
Better adhesion
Cleaner shedding & reduced loom stoppages
Matches PVA performance
This makes modified starch a viable, eco-friendly alternative even in competitive mill environments.
Why Choose a PVA–Starch Blend?
A hybrid starch–PVA sizing formulation is selected when mills want a balance:
Better abrasion resistance than starch
Lower COD than pure PVA
Improved cost control
Blends are popular in apparel fabrics, medium-speed polyester/cotton, and woven sheeting.
Cost-Effectiveness Comparison: PVA vs Starch vs PVA-Starch Mix
Cost Factor | PVA (100%) | Starch | Blend |
Raw Material Cost | High | Low | Medium |
Energy Requirement | High (dissolution temp) | Low–Medium | Medium |
Desizing Cost | Very Low | Low | Medium |
Effluent Treatment | Expensive | Very low | Moderate |
Overall ROI | Medium | High | Medium–High |
Modified starch (e.g., Alpenol’s series) further improves ROI by reducing chemical consumption while maintaining strong warp performance.
How Do These Sizing Agents Impact Yarn Strength & Weaving Efficiency?
PVA
High film flexibility
Excellent for high-speed looms
Strong adhesion → fewer warp breaks
Starch
Good adhesion, especially on cotton
Smooth shedding
Lower hairiness when properly modified
Supports energy-efficient weaving
PVA–Starch Blend
Balanced film properties
Consistent loom efficiency
Suitable for a wide range of looms
Modern biodegradable starch-based alternatives (Alpenol) to PVA provide performance close to PVA but with significantly lower environmental footprint.
Environmental Impact & Sustainability: PVA vs Starch vs Blends
PVA Environmental Drawbacks
Not fully biodegradable
High COD/BOD
Expensive to remove from wastewater
Starch Environmental Strengths
Fully biodegradable
Naturally derived
No harmful residues
Lowest effluent treatment cost
PVA–Starch Mix
Reduced COD compared to pure PVA
Difficult desizability
Lower environmental penalty
Alpenol’s eco-friendly starch-based sizing agents allow mills to reduce PVA dependency without compromising warp performance.
Biodegradability & Desizing Behavior
Parameter | PVA (100%) | Starch | Blend |
Biodegradability | Poor | Excellent | Good |
Desizing | Very Easy | Very easy | Difficult |
Water Rinsability | Low | High | High |
Processing Cost | High | Low | Medium |
Modified starch variants offer extremely clean desizing, helping mills meet ZDHC, EU effluent norms, and GOTS requirements.
What Factors Influence Choosing PVA, Starch, or Hybrid Sizing Agents?
Yarn Type (cotton, poly/cotton, filament, recycled fibers)
Loom Type (air-jet, rapier, shuttle)
Weave Density
Required Film Strength
Budget
Environmental regulations
Fabric category (denim, sheeting, fashion fabrics)
Alpenol’s modified starch solutions are frequently chosen when mills want a sustainable, high-performance, cost-effective option.
PVA vs Starch vs PVA-Starch Mix: Pros & Cons for Fabric Hand, Weaving Efficiency & Desizing
Fabric Hand
PVA → smoother, slightly synthetic
Starch → natural hand feel
Blend → balanced hand feel
Weaving Efficiency
PVA → best for high-speed
Modified starch → strong performance in mid-to-high-speed looms
Blend → consistent efficiency across yarn types
Desizing
Starch → Enzymatic Desizing
PVA → fastest and easiest
Blend → moderate desizing difficulty
This is why many mills now prefer enhanced starch-based textile sizing agents as their primary sizing systems.
FAQ
1. Which is better for textile sizing: PVA or Starch or PVA-Starch mix?
PVA delivers superior performance for high-speed weaving, starch offers advantages in sustainability, cost efficiency, and easy desizing while PVA-Starch mix offers high-speed weaving but also makes desizing difficult. With Alpenol, mills can achieve both high-speed performance and environmentally responsible, cost-effective processing with easy desizing.
2. Why do mills still use PVA?
For its high tensile strength, excellent abrasion resistance, and ability to reduce warp breakage at high loom speeds. However, many mills that switched to Alpenol achieved the same performance benefits while adopting a more sustainable and environmentally responsible alternative.
3. Which sizing chemical is more eco-friendly?
Starch is fully biodegradable, making it more environmentally friendly than PVA. By using Alpenol, you can get the biodegradability benefits of starch and the performance benefits of PVA.
4. Does Alpenol make both PVA and starch-based solutions?
No, Alpenol prioritizes environmental sustainability by offering only starch-based options derived from natural sources, reducing reliance on synthetic polymers, and minimizing ecological footprint.
5. What is the biggest performance difference between PVA and starch?
PVA delivers strong abrasion resistance, while starch enables easier desizing and lower effluent loads. Alpenol’s advanced modified starch grades achieve performance comparable to PVA, yet maintain easy desizing and significantly reduced effluent impact.
Backlink Sources
Liked it? Share it with your people.
Disclaimer
The information provided in this blog is intended solely for educational and informational purposes within the textile industry. While the content references technical concepts, sizing and desizing practices, and general chemical information, it does not constitute professional, commercial, or operational advice for any specific textile process or production environment.
Process conditions, chemical selections, and operational parameters may vary significantly across mills, machinery types, fabric constructions, and environmental constraints. Readers should always consult qualified technical professionals, internal laboratory data, and product-specific Technical Data Sheets before making any decisions related to textile processing.
Any references to Alpenol, Sizaltex, or other products are included only for contextual, educational, and illustrative purposes and should not be interpreted as endorsements, recommendations, or guarantees of performance. The authors assume no responsibility for decisions made based on the information contained herein.
